dch
02-25-2005, 05:12 PM
I'm moving to a new apartment and the way it's laid out (cable outlets in the living room and bedroom, but not at the built in desk) has got me thinking that moving to something wireless would be a good idea. (I've been tempted for quite a while and this is a good excuse. :D )
Anyways, I saw in this thread (http://forums.practicallynetworked.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=5058) a recommendation to go with an "a/g" router, etc. So, I went to my local Best Buy and CompUSA (haven't checked out Fry's yet) to see what they cost. Best Buy had the router on sale for ~$80, but not the corresponding NICs. CompUSA had the NICs, but they are about twice as expensive as the "g" ones.
I plan to run a desktop machine and a laptop (both running Win2K) and maybe at some point down the line I'd add another desktop or laptop. There will be walls to deal with, although perhaps, one machine might be in the same room with the router.
So, it looks to me that the extra expense of the "a/g" NICs isn't waranted. Am I missing something?
Anyways, I saw in this thread (http://forums.practicallynetworked.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=5058) a recommendation to go with an "a/g" router, etc. So, I went to my local Best Buy and CompUSA (haven't checked out Fry's yet) to see what they cost. Best Buy had the router on sale for ~$80, but not the corresponding NICs. CompUSA had the NICs, but they are about twice as expensive as the "g" ones.
I plan to run a desktop machine and a laptop (both running Win2K) and maybe at some point down the line I'd add another desktop or laptop. There will be walls to deal with, although perhaps, one machine might be in the same room with the router.
So, it looks to me that the extra expense of the "a/g" NICs isn't waranted. Am I missing something?